PyPI: tensorflow-rocm-enhanced

CVE-2020-15211

Safety vulnerability ID: SFTY-20200925-40128

Safety legacy ID: pyup.io-58219

Tensorflow-rocm-enhanced versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, and 2.3.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-15211: In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices for the tensors, indexing into an array of tensors that is owned by the subgraph. This results in a pattern of double array indexing when trying to get the data of each tensor. However, some operators can have some tensors be optional. To handle this scenario, the flatbuffer model uses a negative "-1" value as index for these tensors. This results in special casing during validation at model loading time. Unfortunately, this means that the "-1" index is a valid tensor index for any operator, including those that don't expect optional inputs and including for output tensors. Thus, this allows writing and reading from outside the bounds of heap allocated arrays, although only at a specific offset from the start of these arrays. This results in both read and write gadgets, albeit very limited in scope. The issue was patched in several commits (46d5b0852, 00302787b7, e11f5558, cd31fd0ce, 1970c21, and fff2c83). A potential workaround would be to add a custom "Verifier" to the model loading code to ensure that only operators which accept optional inputs use the "-1" special value and only for the tensors that they expect to be optional. Since this allow-list type approach is error-prone, it's advised upgrading to the patched code.

Created at: Jul 5, 2026Updated at: Jul 5, 2026

Overview

Out of bounds access in tensorflow-lite

Advisory

Tensorflow-rocm-enhanced versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, and 2.3.1 include a fix for CVE-2020-15211: In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices for the tensors, indexing into an array of tensors that is owned by the subgraph. This results in a pattern of double array indexing when trying to get the data of each tensor. However, some operators can have some tensors be optional. To handle this scenario, the flatbuffer model uses a negative "-1" value as index for these tensors. This results in special casing during validation at model loading time. Unfortunately, this means that the "-1" index is a valid tensor index for any operator, including those that don't expect optional inputs and including for output tensors. Thus, this allows writing and reading from outside the bounds of heap allocated arrays, although only at a specific offset from the start of these arrays. This results in both read and write gadgets, albeit very limited in scope. The issue was patched in several commits (46d5b0852, 00302787b7, e11f5558, cd31fd0ce, 1970c21, and fff2c83). A potential workaround would be to add a custom "Verifier" to the model loading code to ensure that only operators which accept optional inputs use the "-1" special value and only for the tensors that they expect to be optional. Since this allow-list type approach is error-prone, it's advised upgrading to the patched code.

Affected Package

Affecting tensorflow-rocm-enhanced package, versions<1.15.4>=2.0.0a0,<2.0.3>=2.1.0a0,<2.1.2>=2.2.0a0,<2.2.1>=2.3.0a0,<2.3.1

Also affects

---

How to Fix

Upgradetensorflow-rocm-enhancedto1.15.42.3.12.3.12.3.12.3.1or higher.

Mitigation and Workarounds

---

Vulnerable Functions

Functions linked to known vulnerabilities.

Vulnerable function data is available for Enterprise customers

Book a call with us to see Safety in action.

References

Safety

Verified by Safety

Our Cybersecurity Intelligence Team reviewed this vulnerability. We combine public data with our own research to find issues not yet reported to public sources.

Learn more