PyPI: fastapi
CVE-2021-32677
Safety vulnerability ID: SFTY-20210609-55667
Safety legacy ID: pyup.io-40643
Fastapi version 0.65.2 includes a security fix for CVE-2021-32677: FastAPI versions lower than 0.65.2 that used cookies for authentication in path operations that received JSON payloads sent by browsers were vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. In versions lower than 0.65.2, FastAPI would try to read the request payload as JSON even if the content-type header sent was not set to application/json or a compatible JSON media type (e.g. application/geo+json). A request with a content type of text/plain containing JSON data would be accepted and the JSON data would be extracted. Requests with content type text/plain are exempt from CORS preflights, for being considered Simple requests. The browser will execute them right away including cookies, and the text content could be a JSON string that would be parsed and accepted by the FastAPI application. The request data is now parsed as JSON only if the content-type header is application/json or another JSON compatible media type like application/geo+json. It's best to upgrade to the latest FastAPI, but if updating is not possible then a middleware or a dependency that checks the content-type header and aborts the request if it is not application/json or another JSON compatible content type can act as a mitigating workaround. https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7 https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/commit/fa7e3c996edf2d5482fff8f9d890ac2390dede4d
Overview
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FastAPI
Advisory
Fastapi version 0.65.2 includes a security fix for CVE-2021-32677: FastAPI versions lower than 0.65.2 that used cookies for authentication in path operations that received JSON payloads sent by browsers were vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. In versions lower than 0.65.2, FastAPI would try to read the request payload as JSON even if the content-type header sent was not set to application/json or a compatible JSON media type (e.g. application/geo+json). A request with a content type of text/plain containing JSON data would be accepted and the JSON data would be extracted. Requests with content type text/plain are exempt from CORS preflights, for being considered Simple requests. The browser will execute them right away including cookies, and the text content could be a JSON string that would be parsed and accepted by the FastAPI application. The request data is now parsed as JSON only if the content-type header is application/json or another JSON compatible media type like application/geo+json. It's best to upgrade to the latest FastAPI, but if updating is not possible then a middleware or a dependency that checks the content-type header and aborts the request if it is not application/json or another JSON compatible content type can act as a mitigating workaround. https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7 https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/commit/fa7e3c996edf2d5482fff8f9d890ac2390dede4d
How to Fix
Mitigation and Workarounds
---
Vulnerable Functions
Functions linked to known vulnerabilities.
References
- https://getsafety.com/vulnerabilities/SFTY-20210609-55667/CVE-2021-32677
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-32677
- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/commit/fa7e3c996edf2d5482fff8f9d890ac2390dede4d
- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MATAWX25TYKNEKLDMKWNLYDB34UWTROA/
- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32677
- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/commit/fa7e3c996edf2d5482fff8f9d890ac2390dede4d
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MATAWX25TYKNEKLDMKWNLYDB34UWTROA
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/fastapi/PYSEC-2021-100.yaml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7
Verified by Safety
Our Cybersecurity Intelligence Team reviewed this vulnerability. We combine public data with our own research to find issues not yet reported to public sources.
Learn more
